Yes, contrary to the conventional state of technology and computer programming, simple is still simple. Well, at least it should be.
Quite frequently I read different articles about programming in an attempt to maintain professional relevance. Some are well written articles on good programming techniques. Some are poorly written but the core material is still good. Some are well written pieces about some fluff fad and then there are occasionally the poorly written article about some programming technique or library or concept that has 'bad idea' written all over it.
Rants and Tips from a Crazy Old Telecommuting Programmer.
Showing posts with label Rant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rant. Show all posts
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Friday, August 26, 2016
"We WANT to Protect You..."
Imagine this, if you will...
Your daughter and yourself own and operate a small jewelry repair and gift shop in an old brick building on a busy old street. Most of the business have been there for decades. There's the deli and coffee shop, and the used book and curio shop, and the pharmacy, and the motorcycle repair and accessory shop, and the sporting goods store, and the small bank branch on the corner. The town has a bustling core of tourist traffic that supplies ample amount of financial support. This tourist business is solid but does cause a few issues with fraudulent credit cards and so forth. The merchants do what they can but accept this as a typical danger of being in business.
You notice one day, some merchants are installing these new loss-prevention machines that really seem to be stopping all credit card fraud. Unfortunately they are hesitant to discuss the details and are somewhat unhappy, saying foot traffic is down significantly even though the number of tourists in town is increasing.
One day a couple of fellows come into your store and offer this new system to you. They offer to place a detector and door lock on your front door free of charge. All they ask is that all purchase transactions you make go through them, 'for security purposes.' They will hold all money for three days in their bank account for transaction validation, then release the funds to your bank account.
Here's the big catch... only people who have registered with their service can enter your store. Sure, they can look in your window, and if they ask, you can let them in if they haven't registered, but they don't recommend it.
"Everyone else on your street are using our system and LOVE it! No one has had a fraudulent purchase since our systems have been installed," they say. You tell them you will think about it. They give you their card and leave.
One month later you are balancing your books and realize fraud is up by 20%! Generally foot traffic and cash flow has increased but not enough to cover the new fraud. You call the two fellows selling the anti-fraud solution and have it installed.
That's what seems to be happening to E-Bay. Buyers can look at the items but unless they are PayPal users with validated accounts or addresses or whatever, they can't even put a bid on items. You aren't a PayPal customer, you are shit-outta-luck.
That's how it works... There's fraud happening so E-Bay offers this great service to a few merchants. It's a little shady and locks the buyer base but it works. As more and more merchants use this service, fraud becomes focused on those merchants who don't use it. So, those merchants are pressured into using the service for 'protection'.
Here's what I did. Yesterday I browsed E-Bay looking for deals on used lenses for my Canon Rebel. BINGO, I find a lens and try to put in a bid. I don't use PayPal so... BZZZZTTTTT... I can't even enter a bid. I try entering a bid for another lens. BZZZZTTTTT... same thing. Another? Same thing.
WTF???
Here's what will probably happen in the future... Customers will not like this requirement to be 'verified'... Foot traffic in E-Bay will start declining... E-bay will need to change their validation.
Just my half-asleep $0.02 worth.
Your daughter and yourself own and operate a small jewelry repair and gift shop in an old brick building on a busy old street. Most of the business have been there for decades. There's the deli and coffee shop, and the used book and curio shop, and the pharmacy, and the motorcycle repair and accessory shop, and the sporting goods store, and the small bank branch on the corner. The town has a bustling core of tourist traffic that supplies ample amount of financial support. This tourist business is solid but does cause a few issues with fraudulent credit cards and so forth. The merchants do what they can but accept this as a typical danger of being in business.
You notice one day, some merchants are installing these new loss-prevention machines that really seem to be stopping all credit card fraud. Unfortunately they are hesitant to discuss the details and are somewhat unhappy, saying foot traffic is down significantly even though the number of tourists in town is increasing.
One day a couple of fellows come into your store and offer this new system to you. They offer to place a detector and door lock on your front door free of charge. All they ask is that all purchase transactions you make go through them, 'for security purposes.' They will hold all money for three days in their bank account for transaction validation, then release the funds to your bank account.
Here's the big catch... only people who have registered with their service can enter your store. Sure, they can look in your window, and if they ask, you can let them in if they haven't registered, but they don't recommend it.
"Everyone else on your street are using our system and LOVE it! No one has had a fraudulent purchase since our systems have been installed," they say. You tell them you will think about it. They give you their card and leave.
One month later you are balancing your books and realize fraud is up by 20%! Generally foot traffic and cash flow has increased but not enough to cover the new fraud. You call the two fellows selling the anti-fraud solution and have it installed.
That's what seems to be happening to E-Bay. Buyers can look at the items but unless they are PayPal users with validated accounts or addresses or whatever, they can't even put a bid on items. You aren't a PayPal customer, you are shit-outta-luck.
That's how it works... There's fraud happening so E-Bay offers this great service to a few merchants. It's a little shady and locks the buyer base but it works. As more and more merchants use this service, fraud becomes focused on those merchants who don't use it. So, those merchants are pressured into using the service for 'protection'.
Here's what I did. Yesterday I browsed E-Bay looking for deals on used lenses for my Canon Rebel. BINGO, I find a lens and try to put in a bid. I don't use PayPal so... BZZZZTTTTT... I can't even enter a bid. I try entering a bid for another lens. BZZZZTTTTT... same thing. Another? Same thing.
WTF???
Here's what will probably happen in the future... Customers will not like this requirement to be 'verified'... Foot traffic in E-Bay will start declining... E-bay will need to change their validation.
Just my half-asleep $0.02 worth.
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Da' Truth!!!
So, there I am; innocently driving our ferret back from a veterinarian visit when what in my wondering ears should echo??? The ranting, irritating, disingenuous voice of Sean Hannity on our local AM radio station.
Now, I am neither liberal or conservative; neither republican or democrat. I am a proud independent. That stated, never have I listened to the Sean Hannity show when something was said that didn't make me giggle because of... well... Here's what I heard on the trip home from the vet...
Sean is ranting about how President Obama and Hillary Clinton were both "friends" with the Reverend Al Sharpton; how Reverend Sharpton is a rabel-rouser, a firebrand, an agitator. Those things, I just don't know and honestly don't really care.
Here is what made me LOL... One of the voice tag lines for the show had something to do with the "Truth"; something like "Only the Truth!" or something like that. OK... Still don't care... but then the LOL hit. According to Mr. Hannity, the President and Ms. Clinton both "Kiss Al Sharpton's Ring." Really? I mean, did they kneel? Were they all sitting? Did they bow? Was it one-on-one or a threesome?
Mr Hannity??? Pictures? "Only the Truth" but you say they kissed his ring? Do you have a reference for this? Can you prove they kissed his ring???
Years ago these type of radio shows irritated me. Now they simply provide my inner child with comic relief. Keep talking!!! I need the laughs!
Now, I am neither liberal or conservative; neither republican or democrat. I am a proud independent. That stated, never have I listened to the Sean Hannity show when something was said that didn't make me giggle because of... well... Here's what I heard on the trip home from the vet...
Sean is ranting about how President Obama and Hillary Clinton were both "friends" with the Reverend Al Sharpton; how Reverend Sharpton is a rabel-rouser, a firebrand, an agitator. Those things, I just don't know and honestly don't really care.
Here is what made me LOL... One of the voice tag lines for the show had something to do with the "Truth"; something like "Only the Truth!" or something like that. OK... Still don't care... but then the LOL hit. According to Mr. Hannity, the President and Ms. Clinton both "Kiss Al Sharpton's Ring." Really? I mean, did they kneel? Were they all sitting? Did they bow? Was it one-on-one or a threesome?
Mr Hannity??? Pictures? "Only the Truth" but you say they kissed his ring? Do you have a reference for this? Can you prove they kissed his ring???
Years ago these type of radio shows irritated me. Now they simply provide my inner child with comic relief. Keep talking!!! I need the laughs!
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
More than 110M People have already upgraded...
WOW!!! According to the "ad-ware" pop-up message that seems to appear more and more frequently on my computers, more than 110 million people have upgraded to Windows 10... and for FREE, none the less!!!
Did they do it on purpose? Or... did these people really look at what they were getting?
On a slight tangent... Apparently in recent history an incorrect assumption was made somewhere in my cerebral cortex... I assumed Windows was NOT "ad-ware". I thought this was commercial software that was to be free from advertisements. Oh, sure... This COULD be construed as simply being a somewhat irritating upgrade message. More that somewhat irritating at times perhaps.
And why would the tagline "More than 110 M people have already upgraded..." be a motivating factor for myself, a computing professional, to switch operating systems? I am a critical thinker (most of the time), and, as I get older, am gaining a slight disdain for rapid change. Not long ago Windows XP was phased out. Now... I am being brow-beaten to upgrade my Windows 7 machines to Windows 10?
Seriously, 110 million people... Let me see...
No... Number one, I am not going to take up smoking; Number two, porn is boring and I get more action that I can handle from my better half; and Number three, I like my Android phone.
And... No, I am not upgrading to Windows 10 until I absolutely MUST. Now... Buzz Off, Microsoft!
**Microsoft, Windows, iPhone (etc...) are all owned by their respective owners... I don't want them.
Did they do it on purpose? Or... did these people really look at what they were getting?
On a slight tangent... Apparently in recent history an incorrect assumption was made somewhere in my cerebral cortex... I assumed Windows was NOT "ad-ware". I thought this was commercial software that was to be free from advertisements. Oh, sure... This COULD be construed as simply being a somewhat irritating upgrade message. More that somewhat irritating at times perhaps.
And why would the tagline "More than 110 M people have already upgraded..." be a motivating factor for myself, a computing professional, to switch operating systems? I am a critical thinker (most of the time), and, as I get older, am gaining a slight disdain for rapid change. Not long ago Windows XP was phased out. Now... I am being brow-beaten to upgrade my Windows 7 machines to Windows 10?
Seriously, 110 million people... Let me see...
- According to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, about 1.1 billion people smoke cigarettes.
- According to the Huffington Post, 70% of all men in the US, and 30% of all Women watch pornography. That calculates to about 153 million people in the US.
- According to About.com, there have been 700 million iPhones sold throughout the world.
No... Number one, I am not going to take up smoking; Number two, porn is boring and I get more action that I can handle from my better half; and Number three, I like my Android phone.
And... No, I am not upgrading to Windows 10 until I absolutely MUST. Now... Buzz Off, Microsoft!
**Microsoft, Windows, iPhone (etc...) are all owned by their respective owners... I don't want them.
Thursday, July 9, 2015
PROPERTY RENTAL SCAM ALERT!!!
Here's how it works...
And... **POOF** The prospective tenant is out about $1000!
All of the above happened to my daughter, except for the last two items... The lease agreement looked fishy and that is what made us stand back and say 'whoa!' Fishy how, you ask? Here's a list...
SO, I looked up the previous real estate agent's MLS listing for the property and called her. Sure enough, she had received several reports of possible rental scams on that specific property.
Then, I called the Texas Secretary of State's office and asked them to confirm the notary's name. No confirmation - that person was not a notary, and they confirmed there should be a notary registration number in the stamp.
The scammer sent two documents; a welcome letter (.doc) and lease agreement (.pdf) I scanned them for viruses and after being sure they were clean, opened them up to find a different name... The DOCdocument was last modified by "Philip Ijem". The PDF document was authored by "Philip Ijem".
Heck, we are probably lucky the police weren't called or we weren't shot at when we went to look at the property last Tuesday.
All of you looking for something to rent, BE CAREFUL!!! Check, check & check again!!!
I hope "Philip Ijem" doesn't come face-to-face with my daughter in the next few days... She is PISSED!!!
- The scammer looks at real estate websites for properties that are for sale.
- They find a house with plenty of pictures online. All of the photos and property info is downloaded.
- Then they search online records and find the name of the current owner.
- With that information they create a Craigs List (or other on-line service) rental advertisement, posting all the pictures and property information. All communications with this scammer is through e-mail or a burner cell phone. (In our case, the scammer was using a Phone/text/SMS anonymizer service.)
- Requests to view the property by prospective tenants will result in a response like, "I am not available to show it to you, but there are workers there that will let you in."
- When the tenant feels it is time to move to the next step and put down the deposit, the scammer will e-mail customized lease documents (from a junk Yahoo or GMAIL account). At this point, the scammer may say there are others interested in the property and that the prospective tenant should hurry the remainder of the process.
- The prospective tenant will be asked to sign and email the documents back as quickly as possible.
- Then, the scammer will ask for the deposit and first month's rent up front through a wire transfer or Western Union.
And... **POOF** The prospective tenant is out about $1000!
All of the above happened to my daughter, except for the last two items... The lease agreement looked fishy and that is what made us stand back and say 'whoa!' Fishy how, you ask? Here's a list...
- The lease asked for the deposit and first month's rent by the end of the day, but keys would be exchanged at a later date.
- The legalese in the paperwork looked OK, but having signed several leases myself before, there seemed to be many parts missing... like where to send the monthly payment, contact information for maintenance & service, an arbitration clause, references to other documents not included in the e-mails, etc...
- The person's email signature looked like it came from a valid company in Tyler, TX. I looked up the company and they didn't have an office in Tyler.
- The lease agreement had the "landlord's" signature with a Texas notary stamp & notary signature. BUT!!! The notary stamp had no notary registration number.
SO, I looked up the previous real estate agent's MLS listing for the property and called her. Sure enough, she had received several reports of possible rental scams on that specific property.
Then, I called the Texas Secretary of State's office and asked them to confirm the notary's name. No confirmation - that person was not a notary, and they confirmed there should be a notary registration number in the stamp.
The scammer sent two documents; a welcome letter (.doc) and lease agreement (.pdf) I scanned them for viruses and after being sure they were clean, opened them up to find a different name... The DOCdocument was last modified by "Philip Ijem". The PDF document was authored by "Philip Ijem".
Heck, we are probably lucky the police weren't called or we weren't shot at when we went to look at the property last Tuesday.
All of you looking for something to rent, BE CAREFUL!!! Check, check & check again!!!
I hope "Philip Ijem" doesn't come face-to-face with my daughter in the next few days... She is PISSED!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)